| Cognitive complexity and the linguistic marking of coherence relations: A parallel corpus study J Hoek, S Zufferey, J Evers-Vermeul, TJM Sanders Journal of pragmatics 121, 113-131, 2017 | 95 | 2017 |
| Unifying dimensions in coherence relations: How various annotation frameworks are related TJM Sanders, V Demberg, J Hoek, MCJ Scholman, FT Asr, S Zufferey, ... Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 17 (1), 1-71, 2021 | 75 | 2021 |
| Factors influencing the implicitation of discourse relations across languages J Hoek, S Zufferey Proceedings 11th Joint ACL-ISO Workshop on interoperable semantic annotation …, 2015 | 56 | 2015 |
| Evaluating discourse annotation: Some recent insights and new approaches J Hoek, M Scholman Proceedings of the 13th Joint ISO-ACL Workshop on Interoperable Semantic …, 2017 | 32 | 2017 |
| Segmenting discourse: Incorporating interpretation into segmentation? J Hoek, J Evers-Vermeul, TJM Sanders Corpus Linguistics and Linguistic Theory 14 (2), 357-386, 2018 | 29 | 2018 |
| The role of expectedness in the implicitation and explicitation of discourse relations J Hoek, J Evers-Vermeul, TJM Sanders Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Discourse in Machine Translation, 41-46, 2015 | 28 | 2015 |
| On temporality in discourse annotation: Theoretical and practical considerations J Evers-Vermeul, J Hoek, MCJ Scholman Dialogue & Discourse 8 (2), 1-20, 2017 | 27 | 2017 |
| The linguistic marking of coherence relations: Interactions between connectives and segment-internal elements J Hoek, S Zufferey, J Evers-Vermeul, TJM Sanders Pragmatics & Cognition 25 (2), 276-309, 2018 | 26 | 2018 |
| Using the cognitive approach to coherence relations for discourse annotation J Hoek, J Evers-Vermeul, TJM Sanders Dialogue & Discourse 10 (2), 1-33, 2019 | 25 | 2019 |
| Making sense of discourse: On discourse segmentation and the linguistic marking of coherence relations J Hoek LOT Dissertation Series 509, 2018 | 17 | 2018 |
| Constructing a lexicon of Dutch discourse connectives P Bourgonje, J Hoek, J Evers-Vermeul, G Redeker, T Sanders, M Stede Computational Linguistics in the Netherlands Journal 8, 163-175, 2018 | 16 | 2018 |
| Scolding the child who threw the scissors: Shaping discourse expectations by restricting referents J Hoek, H Rohde, J Evers-Vermeul, TJM Sanders Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 36 (3), 382-399, 2021 | 15 | 2021 |
| Expectations from relative clauses: Real-time coherence updates in discourse processing J Hoek, H Rohde, J Evers-Vermeul, TJM Sanders Cognition 210, 104581, 2021 | 13 | 2021 |
| Referent management in discourse. The accessibility of weak definites A Brocher, F Weeber, J Hoek, K Heusinger Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society …, 2020 | 13 | 2020 |
| Pronominalization and expectations for re-mention: Modeling coreference in contexts with three referents J Hoek, A Kehler, H Rohde Frontiers in Communication 6, 674126, 2021 | 9 | 2021 |
| Discourse rules: the effects of clause order principles on the reading process MCJ Scholman, L Blything, K Cain, J Hoek, J Evers-Vermeul Language, Cognition and Neuroscience 37 (10), 1277-1291, 2022 | 8 | 2022 |
| Is there less annotator agreement when the discourse relation is underspecified? J Hoek, MCJ Scholman, TJM Sanders Proceedings of the First Workshop on Integrating Perspectives on Discourse …, 2021 | 8 | 2021 |
| Automatic coherence analysis of Dutch: Testing the subjectivity hypothesis on a larger scale J Hoek, TJM Sanders, WPMS Spooren Corpora 16 (1), 129-155, 2021 | 6 | 2021 |
| On the optimal interpretation of'yes' and'no'in Dutch J Hoek, H Hoop Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016 | 3 | 2016 |
| This better be interesting: A speaker’s decision to speak cues listeners to expect informative content H Rohde, J Hoek, M Keshev, M Franke Open Mind 6, 118-131, 2022 | 2 | 2022 |
Ted J.M. Sandersprofessor of discourse studies, Utrecht UniversityVerified email at uu.nl