| A neurobiological theory of automaticity in perceptual categorization. FG Ashby, JM Ennis, BJ Spiering Psychological review 114 (3), 632, 2007 | 353 | 2007 |
| The role of the basal ganglia in category learning FG Ashby, JM Ennis Psychology of Learning and Motivation 46, 1-36, 2006 | 171 | 2006 |
| The power of sensory discrimination methods revisited JM Ennis, V Jesionka Journal of Sensory Studies 26 (5), 371-382, 2011 | 168 | 2011 |
| A comparison of adaptive choice‐based conjoint and choice‐based conjoint to determine key choice attributes of sour cream with limited sample size SM Jervis, JM Ennis, MA Drake Journal of sensory studies 27 (6), 451-462, 2012 | 89 | 2012 |
| Thurstonian models for variants of the method of tetrads JM Ennis, DM Ennis, D Yip, M O'Mahony British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology 51 (2), 205-215, 1998 | 86 | 1998 |
| Guiding the switch from triangle testing to tetrad testing JM Ennis Journal of sensory studies 27 (4), 223-231, 2012 | 71 | 2012 |
| Sensory difference tests as measurement instruments: A review of recent advances JM Ennis, B Rousseau, DM Ennis Journal of Sensory Studies 29 (2), 89-102, 2014 | 51 | 2014 |
| Accounting for no difference/preference responses or ties in choice experiments DM Ennis, JM Ennis Food Quality and Preference 23 (1), 13-17, 2012 | 49 | 2012 |
| Tools and Applications of Sensory and Consumer Science: 59 Technical Report Scenarios Based on Real-life Problems DM Ennis, B Rousseau, JM Ennis Institute for Perception, 2014 | 47 | 2014 |
| A large‐scale experimental comparison of the tetrad and triangle tests in children K Garcia, JM Ennis, W Prinyawiwatkul Journal of sensory studies 27 (4), 217-222, 2012 | 47 | 2012 |
| Equivalence hypothesis testing DM Ennis, JM Ennis Food Quality and Preference 21 (3), 253-256, 2010 | 35 | 2010 |
| Analysis and T hurstonian Scaling of Applicability Scores DM Ennis, JM Ennis Journal of Sensory Studies 28 (3), 188-193, 2013 | 32 | 2013 |
| Precision of measurement in Tetrad testing JM Ennis, RHB Christensen Food Quality and Preference 32, 98-106, 2014 | 30 | 2014 |
| Replicated difference and preference tests: how to account for inter-trial variation J Bi, L Templeton-Janik, JM Ennis, DM Ennis Food Quality and Preference 11 (4), 269-273, 2000 | 28 | 2000 |
| Transitioning from proportion of discriminators to a more meaningful measure of sensory difference V Jesionka, B Rousseau, JM Ennis Food Quality and Preference 32, 77-82, 2014 | 26 | 2014 |
| A comparison of three commonly used methods for treating no preference votes JM Ennis, DM Ennis Journal of Sensory Studies 27 (2), 123-129, 2012 | 26 | 2012 |
| Mapping hedonic data: A process perspective DM Ennis, JM Ennis Journal of Sensory Studies 28 (4), 324-334, 2013 | 24 | 2013 |
| Hypothesis testing for equivalence defined on symmetric open intervals DM Ennis, JM Ennis Communications in Statistics—Theory and Methods 38 (11), 1792-1803, 2009 | 24 | 2009 |
| A Thurstonian comparison of the Tetrad and Degree of Difference tests JM Ennis, R Christensen Food Quality and Preference 40, 263-269, 2015 | 22 | 2015 |
| Comparison of preference mapping with projective mapping for characterizing consumer perception of brewed black coffees WS Harwood, KG McLean, JM Ennis, DM Ennis, MA Drake Journal of Sensory Studies 35 (3), e12563, 2020 | 21 | 2020 |
