| What is next for patient preferences in health technology assessment? A systematic review of the challenges SPI Huls, CL Whichello, J van Exel, CA Uyl-de Groot, EW de Bekker-Grob Value in Health 22 (11), 1318-1328, 2019 | 48 | 2019 |
| Productivity of working at home and time allocation between paid work, unpaid work and leisure activities during a pandemic SPI Huls, A Sajjad, TA Kanters, L Hakkaart-van Roijen, WBF Brouwer, ... PharmacoEconomics 40 (1), 77-90, 2022 | 42 | 2022 |
| Psychometric evaluation of the Health-Risk Attitude Scale (HRAS-13): assessing the reliability, dimensionality and validity in the general population and a patient population SPI Huls, SMC van Osch, WBF Brouwer, J van Exel, AM Stiggelbout Psychology & Health 37 (1), 34-50, 2020 | 13 | 2020 |
| Patients', healthcare providers', and insurance company employees' preferences for knee and hip osteoarthritis care: a discrete choice experiment IG Arslan, SPI Huls, EW de Bekker-Grob, R Rozendaal, MCT Persoons, ... Osteoarthritis and Cartilage 28 (10), 1316-1324, 2020 | 13 | 2020 |
| Can healthcare choice be predicted using stated preference data? The role of model complexity in a discrete choice experiment about colorectal cancer screening SPI Huls, EW de Bekker-Grob Social Science & Medicine 315, 115530, 2022 | 9 | 2022 |
| In Absence of Absenteeism: Some Thoughts on Productivity Costs in Economic Evaluations in a Post-corona Era W Brouwer, SPI Huls, A Sajjad, T Kanters, LH Roijen, J van Exel PharmacoEconomics, 1-5, 2021 | 9 | 2021 |
| Two for the price of one: If moving beyond traditional single‐best discrete choice experiments, should we use best‐worst, best‐best or ranking for preference elicitation? SPI Huls, E Lancsar, B Donkers, J Ride Health Economics 31 (12), 2630-2647, 2022 | 8 | 2022 |
| An implantable device to treat multiple sclerosis: a discrete choice experiment on patient preferences in three European countries LA Visser, SPI Huls, CA Uyl-de Groot, EW de Bekker-Grob, WK Redekop Journal of the Neurological Sciences 428, 117587, 2021 | 8 | 2021 |
| An attempt to decrease social desirability bias: The effect of cheap talk mitigation on internal and external validity of discrete choice experiments SPI Huls, J van Exel, EW de Bekker-Grob Food Quality and Preference 111, 104986, 2023 | 6 | 2023 |
| Preference variation: where does health risk attitude come into the equation? SPI Huls, J Veldwijk, JD Swait, JV Johansson, M Ancillotti, ... Value in Health 25 (12), 2044-2052, 2022 | 5 | 2022 |
| Prosocial behaviour and antibiotic resistance: evidence from a discrete choice experiment M Ancillotti, SPI Huls, EM Krockow, J Veldwijk The Patient-Patient-Centered Outcomes Research 17 (2), 191-202, 2024 | 3 | 2024 |
| Tijdens lockdown maakten werkenden minder uren en kregen ze minder gedaan SPI Huls, A Sajjad, T Kanters, L Hakkaart-van Roijen, W Brouwer, ... Economisch-Statistische Berichten 106 (4793), 11-13, 2021 | 1 | 2021 |
| P27 How Untruthfulness in Self-Reported Medication Adherence Influences Treatment Preferences: A Discrete Choice Experiment C Oedingen, R van Gestel, S Huls, E de Bekker-Grob, J Veldwijk Value in Health 26 (12), S7, 2023 | | 2023 |
| Saying yes, doing no? Investigating the internal and external validity of discrete choice experiments to inform healthcare decision making SPI Huls Erasmus University, 2022 | | 2022 |
| How to Decrease Social Desirability Bias in Stated Preference Data? Lessons Learned SPI Huls, J van Exel, EW de Bekker-Grob The Patient 15 (6), 732-732, 2022 | | 2022 |
| Individualized Outcome Measures in Prostate Cancer Screening FP Baptista, WK van Deen, SPI Huls, M Varkevisser | | 2021 |
| an, Brouwer, WBF, Exel,. an, & Stiggelbout, M.(2020) SPI Huls, SMC Osch Ps chometric e aluation of the Health-Risk ttitude Scale (HR S-13 …, 0 | | |
| How to Decrease Social Desirability Bias in Stated Preference Data? An Attempt Gone to (Food) Waste SPI Huls, J van Exel, E de Bekker-Grob An Attempt Gone to (Food) Waste, 0 | | |