| Artificial intelligence and the future of defense: strategic implications for small-and medium-sized force providers S De Spiegeleire, M Maas, T Sweijs The Hague Centre for Strategic Studies, 2017 | 187* | 2017 |
| How viable is international arms control for military artificial intelligence? Three lessons from nuclear weapons MM Maas Contemporary Security Policy 40 (3), 285-311, 2019 | 132 | 2019 |
| Artificial intelligence and crime: A primer for criminologists KJ Hayward, MM Maas Crime, Media, Culture: An International Journal, 2020 | 122 | 2020 |
| Long-term trajectories of human civilization SD Baum, S Armstrong, T Ekenstedt, O Häggström, R Hanson, ... Foresight 21 (1), 53-83, 2019 | 110 | 2019 |
| International Law Does Not Compute: Artificial Intelligence and the Development, Displacement or Destruction of the Global Legal Order MM Maas Melbourne Journal of International Law 20 (1), 29-56, 2019 | 91 | 2019 |
| Fragmentation and the Future: Investigating Architectures for International AI Governance P Cihon, MM Maas, L Kemp Global Policy 11 (5), 545-556, 2020 | 87 | 2020 |
| Governing boring apocalypses: A new typology of existential vulnerabilities and exposures for existential risk research HY Liu, KC Lauta, MM Maas Futures 102 (September), 6-19, 2018 | 73 | 2018 |
| Should artificial intelligence governance be centralised? Design lessons from history P Cihon, MM Maas, L Kemp Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 228-234, 2020 | 70 | 2020 |
| Artificial intelligence and legal disruption: a new model for analysis HY Liu, M Maas, J Danaher, L Scarcella, M Lexer, L Van Rompaey Law, Innovation and Technology 12 (2), 205-258, 2020 | 56 | 2020 |
| Regulating for 'Normal AI Accidents': Operational Lessons for the Responsible Governance of Artificial Intelligence Deployment MM Maas Proceedings of the 2018 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, 223-228, 2018 | 52* | 2018 |
| Innovation-Proof Global Governance for Military Artificial Intelligence? MM Maas Journal of International Humanitarian Legal Studies 10 (1), 129-157, 2019 | 46 | 2019 |
| Solving for X? Towards a problem-finding framework to ground long-term governance strategies for artificial intelligence HY Liu, MM Maas Futures, 2021 | 43 | 2021 |
| State and non-state actors: beyond the dichotomy P Wijninga, WT Oosterveld, JH Galdiga, P Marten, E Chivot, M Gehem, ... Strategic monitor 2014: Four strategic challenges, 139-162, 2014 | 43 | 2014 |
| Bridging the gap: the case for an ‘Incompletely Theorized Agreement’ on AI policy C Stix, MM Maas AI and Ethics, 2021 | 26 | 2021 |
| What is artificial intelligence S De Spiegeleire, M Maas, T Sweijs Artificial intelligence and the future of defense: Strategic implications …, 2017 | 25 | 2017 |
| Aligning AI regulation to sociotechnical change MM Maas The Oxford Handbook of AI Governance, 2022 | 24 | 2022 |
| Artificial Intelligence Governance Under Change: Foundations, Facets, Frameworks MM Maas University of Copenhagen, 2021 | 17 | 2021 |
| Apocalypse now?: Initial lessons from the Covid-19 pandemic for the governance of existential and global catastrophic risks HY Liu, K Lauta, M Maas Journal of International Humanitarian Legal Studies 11 (2), 295-310, 2020 | 17 | 2020 |
| 10. Military Artificial Intelligence as a Contributor to Global Catastrophic Risk MM Maas, K Lucero-Matteucci, D Cooke Open Book Publishers, 2023 | 15 | 2023 |
| International AI Institutions: A Literature Review of Models, Examples, and Proposals MM Maas, JJ Villalobos https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4579773, 2023 | 12 | 2023 |
Stephan De SpiegeleireThe Hague Centre for Strategic StudiesE-mail megerősítve itt: hcss.nl