| Organizational Citizenship Behavior in the Public Sector: A Systematic Literature Review and Future Research Agenda CJC de Geus, A Ingrams, L Tummers, SK Pandey Public Administration Review 80 (2), 259-270, 2020 | 269 | 2020 |
| Conceptualizing e-government from local government perspectives AP Manoharan, A Ingrams State and Local Government Review 50 (1), 56-66, 2018 | 192* | 2018 |
| Stages and determinants of e-government development: A twelve-year longitudinal study of global cities A Ingrams, A Manoharan, L Schmidthuber, M Holzer International Public Management Journal 23 (6), 731-769, 2020 | 166 | 2020 |
| Learning from our mistakes: public management reform and the hope of open government A Ingrams, S Piotrowski, D Berliner Perspectives on Public Management and Governance 3 (4), 257-272, 2020 | 132 | 2020 |
| Government openness and public trust: The mediating role of democratic capacity L Schmidthuber, A Ingrams, D Hilgers Public Administration Review 81 (1), 91-109, 2021 | 131 | 2021 |
| Organizational citizenship behavior in the public and private sectors: A multilevel test of public service motivation and traditional antecedents A Ingrams Review of Public Personnel Administration 40 (2), 222-244, 2020 | 116 | 2020 |
| In AI we trust? Citizen perceptions of AI in government decision making A Ingrams, W Kaufmann, D Jacobs Policy and Internet, 2021 | 84 | 2021 |
| Open data driven public accountability RP Lourenço, S Piotrowski, A Ingrams Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy 11 (1), 42-57, 2017 | 75 | 2017 |
| Globalization and worldwide best practices in E-Government AP Manoharan, A Ingrams, D Kang, H Zhao International Journal of Public Administration 44 (6), 465-476, 2021 | 69 | 2021 |
| Mobile phones, smartphones, and the transformation of civic behavior through mobile information and connectivity A Ingrams Government Information Quarterly 32 (4), 506-515, 2015 | 57 | 2015 |
| Public values in the age of big data: A public information perspective A Ingrams Policy & Internet 11 (2), 128-148, 2019 | 50 | 2019 |
| Administrative reform and the quest for openness: A Popperian review of open government A Ingrams Administration & Society 52 (2), 319-340, 2020 | 46 | 2020 |
| The legal‐normative conditions of police transparency: A configurational approach to open data adoption using qualitative comparative analysis A Ingrams Public Administration 95 (2), 527-545, 2017 | 42 | 2017 |
| Levels of Value Integration in Federal Agencies' Mission and Value Statements: Is Open Government a Performance Target of US Federal Agencies? S Piotrowski, DH Rosenbloom, S Kang, A Ingrams Public Administration Review, 2018 | 41 | 2018 |
| The Future of FOIA in an Open Government World: Implications of the Open Government Agenda for Freedom of Information Policy and Implementation D Berliner, A Ingrams, SJ Piotrowski Villanova Law Review 63 (5), 867, 2019 | 39* | 2019 |
| E‐participation Opportunities and the Ambiguous Role of Corruption: A Model of Municipal Responsiveness to Sociopolitical Factors A Ingrams, HL Schachter Public Administration Review, 2019 | 37 | 2019 |
| Transparency for results: Testing a model of performance management in open government initiatives A Ingrams International journal of public administration 41 (13), 1033-1046, 2018 | 34 | 2018 |
| Open Government Maturity Models: A Global Comparison A Pirannejad, A Ingrams Social Science Computer Review, 2022 | 28 | 2022 |
| Democratic transition and transparency reform: An fsQCA analysis of access to information laws in twenty-three countries A Ingrams Government Information Quarterly 35 (3), 428-436, 2018 | 26 | 2018 |
| Testing the open government recipe: Are vision and voice good governance ingredients? A Ingrams, W Kaufmann, D Jacobs Journal of Behavioral Public Administration 3 (1), 2020 | 24 | 2020 |
Suzanne J. PiotrowskiProfessor of Public Affairs and Administration, Rutgers University確認したメール アドレス: newark.rutgers.edu
