| Minimal surfaces of the 3-dimensional Minkowski space I Van de Woestijne Geometry and topology of submanifolds, II, 344-369, 1990 | 168 | 1990 |
| Comparing Malmquist and Hicks–Moorsteen productivity indices: Exploring the impact of unbalanced vs. balanced panel data K Kerstens, I Van de Woestyne European Journal of Operational Research 233 (3), 749-758, 2014 | 123 | 2014 |
| Negative data in DEA: a simple proportional distance function approach K Kerstens, I Van de Woestyne Journal of the Operational Research Society 62 (7), 1413-1419, 2011 | 104 | 2011 |
| Metatechnology frontier and convexity: A restatement K Kerstens, C O’donnell, I Van de Woestyne European Journal of Operational Research 275 (2), 780-792, 2019 | 98 | 2019 |
| Geometric representation of the mean–variance–skewness portfolio frontier based upon the shortage function K Kerstens, A Mounir, I Van de Woestyne European Journal of Operational Research 210 (1), 81-94, 2011 | 78 | 2011 |
| Non-parametric frontier estimates of mutual fund performance using C-and L-moments: Some specification tests K Kerstens, A Mounir, I Van de Woestyne Journal of Banking & Finance 35 (5), 1190-1201, 2011 | 60 | 2011 |
| Translation surfaces of Weingarten type in 3-space F Dillen, W Goemans, I Van de Woestyne | 48 | 2008 |
| Portfolio selection with skewness: A comparison of methods and a generalized one fund result W Briec, K Kerstens, I Van de Woestyne European Journal of Operational Research 230 (2), 412-421, 2013 | 43 | 2013 |
| Comparing Luenberger and Luenberger-Hicks-Moorsteen productivity indicators: How well is total factor productivity approximated? K Kerstens, Z Shen, I Van de Woestyne International Journal of Production Economics 195, 311-318, 2018 | 42 | 2018 |
| Metafrontier productivity indices: Questioning the common convexification strategy Q Jin, K Kerstens, I Van de Woestyne European Journal of Operational Research 283 (2), 737-747, 2020 | 40 | 2020 |
| Global and local scale characteristics in convex and nonconvex nonparametric technologies: A first empirical exploration G Cesaroni, K Kerstens, I Van de Woestyne European Journal of Operational Research 259 (2), 576-586, 2017 | 40 | 2017 |
| The surface of scherk in E^ 3: a special case in the class of minimal surfaces defined as the sum of two curves F Dillen, I Van de Woestyne, L Verstraelen, J Walrave Bulletin of the institute of mathematics Academia Sinica 26 (4), 257-267, 1998 | 40 | 1998 |
| Convex and nonconvex input-oriented technical and economic capacity measures: An empirical comparison K Kerstens, J Sadeghi, I Van de Woestyne European Journal of Operational Research 276 (2), 699-709, 2019 | 34 | 2019 |
| Solution methods for nonconvex free disposal hull models: A review and some critical comments K Kerstens, I Van De Woestyne Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research 31 (01), 1450010, 2014 | 32 | 2014 |
| Portfolio performance gauging in discrete time using a Luenberger productivity indicator O Brandouy, W Briec, K Kerstens, I Van de Woestyne Journal of Banking & Finance 34 (8), 1899-1910, 2010 | 31 | 2010 |
| Minimal homothetical hypersurfaces of a semi-Euclidean space I Van de Woestyne Results in Mathematics 27, 333-342, 1995 | 31 | 1995 |
| Cost functions are nonconvex in the outputs when the technology is nonconvex: Convexification is not harmless K Kerstens, I Van de Woestyne Annals of Operations Research 305 (1), 81-106, 2021 | 30 | 2021 |
| A new input‐oriented plant capacity notion: definition and empirical comparison G Cesaroni, K Kerstens, I Van de Woestyne Pacific Economic Review 22 (4), 720-739, 2017 | 30 | 2017 |
| Frontier-based vs. traditional mutual fund ratings: A first backtesting analysis O Brandouy, K Kerstens, I Van de Woestyne European Journal of Operational Research 242 (1), 332-342, 2015 | 30 | 2015 |
| A note on a variant of radial measure capable of dealing with negative inputs and outputs in DEA K Kerstens, I Van de Woestyne European Journal of Operational Research 234 (1), 341-342, 2014 | 29 | 2014 |