| Risk assessment tools in criminal justice and forensic psychiatry: The need for better data T Douglas, J Pugh, I Singh, J Savulescu, S Fazel European psychiatry 42, 134-137, 2017 | 178 | 2017 |
| The moral imperative to continue gene editing research on human embryos J Savulescu, J Pugh, T Douglas, C Gyngell Protein & cell 6 (7), 476-479, 2015 | 161 | 2015 |
| Autonomy, rationality, and contemporary bioethics J Pugh Oxford University Press, 2020 | 103 | 2020 |
| Considerations and methods for placebo controls in surgical trials (ASPIRE guidelines) DJ Beard, MK Campbell, JM Blazeby, AJ Carr, C Weijer, BH Cuthbertson, ... The Lancet 395 (10226), 828-838, 2020 | 81 | 2020 |
| Deep brain stimulation, authenticity and value J Pugh, H Maslen, J Savulescu Cambridge quarterly of healthcare ethics 26 (4), 640-657, 2017 | 75 | 2017 |
| The ethics of deep brain stimulation for the treatment of anorexia nervosa H Maslen, J Pugh, J Savulescu Neuroethics 8 (3), 215-230, 2015 | 68* | 2015 |
| Brainjacking in deep brain stimulation and autonomy J Pugh, L Pycroft, A Sandberg, T Aziz, J Savulescu Ethics and information technology 20, 219-232, 2018 | 66 | 2018 |
| Driven to extinction? The ethics of eradicating mosquitoes with gene-drive technologies J Pugh Journal of medical ethics 42 (9), 578-581, 2016 | 64 | 2016 |
| Balancing incentives and disincentives for vaccination in a pandemic J Savulescu, J Pugh, D Wilkinson Nature Medicine 27 (9), 1500-1503, 2021 | 51 | 2021 |
| The unnaturalistic fallacy: COVID-19 vaccine mandates should not discriminate against natural immunity J Pugh, J Savulescu, RCH Brown, D Wilkinson Journal of medical ethics 48 (6), 371-377, 2022 | 41 | 2022 |
| Clarifying the normative significance of ‘personality changes’ following deep brain stimulation J Pugh Science and Engineering Ethics 26, 1655-1680, 2020 | 37 | 2020 |
| Vaccine mandates for healthcare workers beyond COVID-19 A Giubilini, J Savulescu, J Pugh, D Wilkinson Journal of Medical Ethics 49 (3), 211-220, 2023 | 34 | 2023 |
| Justifications for non-consensual medical intervention: from infectious disease control to criminal rehabilitation J Pugh, T Douglas Criminal justice ethics 35 (3), 205-229, 2016 | 32 | 2016 |
| No going back? Reversibility and why it matters for deep brain stimulation J Pugh Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (4), 225-230, 2019 | 31 | 2019 |
| Unexpected complications of novel deep brain stimulation treatments: ethical issues and clinical recommendations H Maslen, B Cheeran, J Pugh, L Pycroft, S Boccard, S Prangnell, ... Neuromodulation: Technology at the Neural Interface 21 (2), 135-143, 2018 | 31 | 2018 |
| Evidence-based neuroethics, deep brain stimulation and personality-deflating, but not bursting, the bubble J Pugh, L Pycroft, H Maslen, T Aziz, J Savulescu Neuroethics 14, 27-38, 2021 | 30 | 2021 |
| The morally disruptive future of reprogenetic enhancement technologies J Rueda, J Pugh, J Savulescu Trends in Biotechnology 41 (5), 589-592, 2023 | 28 | 2023 |
| Autonomy, Natality and Freedom: A Liberal Re‐examination of Habermas in the Enhancement Debate J Pugh Bioethics 29 (3), 145-152, 2015 | 28 | 2015 |
| The moral status of human embryo‐like structures: potentiality matters? The moral status of human synthetic embryos T Sawai, T Minakawa, J Pugh, K Akatsuka, JK Yamashita, M Fujita EMBO reports 21 (8), 251-254, 2020 | 25 | 2020 |
| How should we deal with misattributed paternity? A survey of lay public attitudes G Lowe, J Pugh, G Kahane, L Corben, S Lewis, M Delatycki, J Savulescu AJOB empirical bioethics 8 (4), 234-242, 2017 | 24 | 2017 |