The wisdom of polarized crowds F Shi, M Teplitskiy, E Duede, JA Evans Nature human behaviour 3 (4), 329-336, 2019 | 212 | 2019 |
Amplifying the impact of open access: Wikipedia and the diffusion of science M Teplitskiy, G Lu, E Duede Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2016 | 173 | 2016 |
The sociology of scientific validity: How professional networks shape judgement in peer review M Teplitskiy, D Acuna, A Elamrani-Raoult, K Körding, J Evans Research Policy 47 (9), 1825-1841, 2018 | 114 | 2018 |
How status of research papers affects the way they are read and cited M Teplitskiy, E Duede, M Menietti, KR Lakhani Research Policy 51 (4), 104484, 2022 | 106* | 2022 |
Conservatism Gets Funded? A Field Experiment on the Role of Negative Information in Novel Project Evaluation JN Lanei, M Teplitskiy, G Gray, H Ranu, M Menietti, E Guinan, KR Lakhani Management Science, 2021 | 85* | 2021 |
Does double‐blind peer review reduce bias? Evidence from a top computer science conference M Sun, J Barry Danfa, M Teplitskiy Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology 73 (6 …, 2022 | 43 | 2022 |
Is novel research worth doing? Evidence from peer review at 49 journals M Teplitskiy, H Peng, A Blasco, KR Lakhani Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 119 (47), e2118046119, 2022 | 33* | 2022 |
Consensus, Polarization, and Alignment in the Economics Profession TS Van Gunten, JL Martin, M Teplitskiy Sociological Science, 2016 | 32 | 2016 |
Frame search and re-search: How quantitative sociological articles change during peer review M Teplitskiy The American Sociologist 47 (2), 264-288, 2016 | 32 | 2016 |
Author mentions in science news reveal widespread disparities across name-inferred ethnicities H Peng, M Teplitskiy, D Jurgens Quantitative Science Studies 5 (2), 351-365, 2024 | 14* | 2024 |
The Gender Gap in Scholarly Self-Promotion on Social Media H Peng, M Teplitskiy, DM Romero, EÁ Horvát arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.05330, 2022 | 14 | 2022 |
Being together in place as a catalyst for scientific advance E Duede, M Teplitskiy, K Lakhani, J Evans Research Policy 53 (2), 104911, 2024 | 11 | 2024 |
Acceptance in Top Journals Shows Large Disparities across Name-inferred Ethnicities H Peng, K Lakhani, M Teplitskiy SocArXiv, 2021 | 10 | 2021 |
Do Peer Reviews Predict Impact? Evidence from the American Sociological Review, 1978 to 1982 M Teplitskiy, V Bakanic Socius 2, 2378023116640278, 2016 | 10 | 2016 |
A simulation-based analysis of the impact of rhetorical citations in science H Bao, M Teplitskiy Nature Communications 15 (1), 431, 2024 | 5* | 2024 |
The effect of conference presentations on the diffusion of ideas M Teplitskiy, S Park, N Thompson, D Karger arXiv preprint arXiv:2209.01175, 2022 | 5* | 2022 |
Are politically diverse teams more effective F Shi, M Teplitskiy, E Duede, J Evans Harvard Business Review, 2-5, 2019 | 5 | 2019 |
Where there's a will there's a way: ChatGPT is used more for science in countries where it is prohibited H Bao, M Sun, M Teplitskiy arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.11583, 2024 | 3 | 2024 |
SCIENTIFIC MEETINGS MATTER: TURNING UP FOR TALKS BRINGS BENEFITS K Sanderson Nature 618 (7963), 15-16, 2023 | 2 | 2023 |
The bias-reducing effect of voluntary anonymization of authors’ identities: Evidence from peer review I Smirnova, DM Romero, M Teplitskiy Available at SSRN 4190623, 2023 | 2 | 2023 |