| Design factors in mouse-tracking: What makes a difference? PJ Kieslich, M Schoemann, T Grage, J Hepp, S Scherbaum Behavior Research Methods 52 (1), 317-341, 2020 | 70 | 2020 |
| Validating mouse-tracking: How design factors influence action dynamics in intertemporal decision making M Schoemann, M Lüken, T Grage, PJ Kieslich, S Scherbaum Behavior research methods 51 (5), 2356-2377, 2019 | 39 | 2019 |
| Processing emotions: Effects of menstrual cycle phase and premenstrual symptoms on the startle reflex, facial EMG and heart rate D Armbruster, T Grage, C Kirschbaum, A Strobel Behavioural brain research 351, 178-187, 2018 | 37 | 2018 |
| Lost to translation: How design factors of the mouse-tracking procedure impact the inference from action to cognition T Grage, M Schoemann, PJ Kieslich, S Scherbaum Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics 81 (7), 2538-2557, 2019 | 23 | 2019 |
| Action dynamics reveal two types of cognitive flexibility in a homonym relatedness judgment task M Dshemuchadse, T Grage, S Scherbaum Frontiers in psychology 6, 1244, 2015 | 14 | 2015 |
| " Validating mouse-tracking: How design factors influence action dynamics in intertemporal decision making": Correction. M Schoemann, M Lüken, T Grage, PJ Kieslich, S Scherbaum Springer, 2020 | 1* | 2020 |
