Volgen
Patricia Zapf
Titel
Geciteerd door
Geciteerd door
Jaar
A meta-analytic review of competency to stand trial research.
G Pirelli, WH Gottdiener, PA Zapf
Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 17 (1), 1, 2011
2902011
Cognitive bias and blindness: A global survey of forensic science examiners
J Kukucka, SM Kassin, PA Zapf, IE Dror
Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 6 (4), 452-459, 2017
1962017
Have the courts abdicated their responsibility for determination of competency to stand trial to clinicians?
PA Zapf, KL Hubbard, VG Cooper, MC Wheeles, KA Ronan
Journal of Forensic Psychology Practice 4 (1), 27-44, 2004
1802004
Defining and assessing competency to stand trial.
R Roesch, PA Zapf, SL Golding, JL Skeem
John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 1999
1641999
Understanding and mitigating bias in forensic evaluation: Lessons from forensic science
PA Zapf, IE Dror
International Journal of Forensic Mental Health 16 (3), 227-238, 2017
1452017
Adjudicative competence and comprehension of Miranda rights in adolescent defendants: A comparison of legal standards
JL Viljoen, PA Zapf, R Roesch
Behavioral Sciences & the Law 25 (1), 1-19, 2007
1412007
Juvenile competence to stand trial evaluations: A survey of current practices and test usage among psychologists.
NL Ryba, VG Cooper, PA Zapf
Professional Psychology: Research and Practice 34 (5), 499, 2003
1312003
Cognitive bias in forensic mental health assessment: Evaluator beliefs about its nature and scope.
PA Zapf, J Kukucka, SM Kassin, IE Dror
Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 24 (1), 1, 2018
1282018
Predictor variables in competency to stand trial decisions
VG Cooper, PA Zapf
Law and Human Behavior 27, 423-436, 2003
1182003
Evaluation of competence to stand trial
P Zapf, R Roesch
Oxford University Press, 2008
1102008
Competency restoration: An examination of the differences between defendants predicted restorable and not restorable to competency
KL Hubbard, PA Zapf, KA Ronan
Law and human behavior 27, 127-139, 2003
1102003
An examination of the relationship between competency to stand trial, competency to waive interrogation rights, and psychopathology
JL Viljoen, R Roesch, PA Zapf
Law and Human Behavior 26, 481-506, 2002
1042002
Dispositional decisions with the mentally ill: Police perceptions and characteristics
VG Cooper, AM Mclearen, PA Zapf
Police Quarterly 7 (3), 295-310, 2004
1022004
Future directions in the restoration of competency to stand trial
PA Zapf, R Roesch
Current Directions in Psychological Science 20 (1), 43-47, 2011
1002011
Clinician variation in findings of competence to stand trial.
DC Murrie, MT Boccaccini, PA Zapf, JI Warren, CE Henderson
Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 14 (3), 177, 2008
992008
Psychiatric Patients’ Comprehension of Miranda Rights
VG Cooper, PA Zapf
Law and Human Behavior 32, 390-405, 2008
962008
FIT-R: Fitness Interview Test-Revised. A structured interview for assessing competency to stand trial.
R Roesch, PA Zapf, D Eaves
Professional Resource Press/Professional Resource Exchange, 2006
852006
Transfer to adult court: A national study of how juvenile court judges weigh pertinent Kent criteria.
DN Brannen, RT Salekin, PA Zapf, KL Salekin, FA Kubak, J DeCoster
Psychology, Public Policy, and Law 12 (3), 332, 2006
832006
The assessment of criminal responsibility: Current controversies
SL Golding, JL Skeem, R Roesch, PA Zapf
The handbook of forensic psychology 2, 1999
721999
Conceptualizing and assessing competency to stand trial: Implications and applications of the MacArthur Treatment Competence Model.
R Roesch, SD Hart, PA Zapf
American Psychological Association 2 (1), 96, 1996
671996
Het systeem kan de bewerking nu niet uitvoeren. Probeer het later opnieuw.
Artikelen 1–20