| Social egg freezing: for better, not for worse H Mertes, G Pennings Reproductive biomedicine online 23 (7), 824-829, 2011 | 166 | 2011 |
| Recent developments in genetics and medically-assisted reproduction: from research to clinical applications JC Harper, K Aittomäki, P Borry, MC Cornel, G De Wert, W Dondorp, ... Human reproduction open 2017 (3), hox015, 2017 | 124 | 2017 |
| Does company-sponsored egg freezing promote or confine women’s reproductive autonomy? H Mertes Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics 32, 1205-1209, 2015 | 88 | 2015 |
| Elective oocyte cryopreservation: who should pay? H Mertes, G Pennings Human reproduction 27 (1), 9-13, 2012 | 77 | 2012 |
| Oocyte donation for stem cell research H Mertes, G Pennings Human Reproduction 22 (3), 629-634, 2007 | 52 | 2007 |
| The portrayal of healthy women requesting oocyte cryopreservation H Mertes Facts, views & vision in ObGyn 5 (2), 141, 2013 | 47 | 2013 |
| Implications of oocyte cryostorage for the practice of oocyte donation H Mertes, G Pennings, W Dondorp, G de Wert Human Reproduction 27 (10), 2886-2893, 2012 | 41 | 2012 |
| Incidental or secondary findings: an integrative and patient-inclusive approach to the current debate M Saelaert, H Mertes, E De Baere, I Devisch European Journal of Human Genetics 26 (10), 1424-1431, 2018 | 40 | 2018 |
| Ethical quandaries around expanded carrier screening in third-party reproduction H Mertes, SR Lindheim, G Pennings Fertility and sterility 109 (2), 190-194, 2018 | 38 | 2018 |
| Balancing ethical pros and cons of stem cell derived gametes S Segers, H Mertes, G de Wert, W Dondorp, G Pennings Annals of biomedical engineering 45, 1620-1632, 2017 | 38 | 2017 |
| Getting what you desire: the normative significance of genetic relatedness in parent–child relationships S Segers, G Pennings, H Mertes Medicine, health care and philosophy 22 (3), 487-495, 2019 | 37 | 2019 |
| Ethical values supporting the disclosure of incidental and secondary findings in clinical genomic testing: a qualitative study M Saelaert, H Mertes, T Moerenhout, E De Baere, I Devisch BMC Medical Ethics 21, 1-12, 2020 | 35 | 2020 |
| Does human genome editing reinforce or violate human dignity? S Segers, H Mertes Bioethics 34 (1), 33-40, 2020 | 31 | 2020 |
| Embryonic stem cell–derived gametes and genetic parenthood: a problematic relationship H Mertes, G Pennings Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 17 (1), 7-14, 2008 | 31 | 2008 |
| Human in vitro spermatogenesis from pluripotent stem cells: in need of a stepwise differentiation protocol? C Rombaut, H Mertes, B Heindryckx, E Goossens MHR: Basic science of reproductive medicine 24 (2), 47-54, 2018 | 27 | 2018 |
| The role of anticipated decision regret and the patient's best interest in sterilisation and medically assisted reproduction H Mertes Journal of medical ethics 43 (5), 314-318, 2017 | 27 | 2017 |
| Ethical issues in infertility treatment G Pennings, H Mertes Best Practice & Research Clinical Obstetrics & Gynaecology 26 (6), 853-863, 2012 | 27 | 2012 |
| Attitudes towards social oocyte freezing from a socio-cultural perspective M Schick, R Sexty, B Ditzen, T Wischmann Geburtshilfe und Frauenheilkunde 77 (07), 747-755, 2017 | 26 | 2017 |
| Criteria for reporting incidental findings in clinical exome sequencing–a focus group study on professional practices and perspectives in Belgian genetic centres M Saelaert, H Mertes, T Moerenhout, E De Baere, I Devisch BMC Medical Genomics 12, 1-11, 2019 | 24 | 2019 |
| Gamete derivation from stem cells: revisiting the concept of genetic parenthood H Mertes Journal of Medical Ethics 40 (11), 744-747, 2014 | 24 | 2014 |
Pennings GuidoGhent UniversityZweryfikowany adres z ugent.be
