Các bài viết có thể truy cập công khai - Prof Julian HigginsTìm hiểu thêm
Không có ở bất kỳ nơi nào: 14
Đánh giá
Meta-analysis and subgroups
M Borenstein, JPT Higgins
Prevention Science, 2012
Các cơ quan ủy nhiệm: US National Institutes of Health
Đánh giá
Including non‐randomized studies on intervention effects
BC Reeves, JJ Deeks, JPT Higgins, B Shea, P Tugwell, GA Wells, ...
Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions, 595-620, 2019
Các cơ quan ủy nhiệm: National Institute for Health Research, UK
Đánh giá
Comparative performance of heterogeneity variance estimators in meta‐analysis: a review of simulation studies
D Langan, JPT Higgins, M Simmonds
Research synthesis methods 8 (2), 181-198, 2017
Các cơ quan ủy nhiệm: UK Medical Research Council, National Institute for Health Research, UK
Đánh giá
A general framework for the use of logistic regression models in meta-analysis
MC Simmonds, JPT Higgins
Statistical methods in medical research 25 (6), 2858-2877, 2016
Các cơ quan ủy nhiệm: UK Medical Research Council
Đánh giá
Bayesian multivariate meta‐analysis with multiple outcomes
Y Wei, JPT Higgins
Statistics in medicine 32 (17), 2911-2934, 2013
Các cơ quan ủy nhiệm: UK Medical Research Council
Đánh giá
Evaluating the impact of imputations for missing participant outcome data in a network meta-analysis
LM Spineli, JPT Higgins, A Cipriani, S Leucht, G Salanti
Clinical trials 10 (3), 378-388, 2013
Các cơ quan ủy nhiệm: UK Medical Research Council
Đánh giá
Sample size calculation for meta‐epidemiological studies
B Giraudeau, JPT Higgins, E Tavernier, L Trinquart
Statistics in medicine 35 (2), 239-250, 2016
Các cơ quan ủy nhiệm: UK Medical Research Council, National Institute for Health Research, UK
Đánh giá
The impact of trial characteristics on premature discontinuation of antipsychotics in schizophrenia
LM Spineli, S Leucht, A Cipriani, JPT Higgins, G Salanti
European Neuropsychopharmacology 23 (9), 1010-1016, 2013
Các cơ quan ủy nhiệm: UK Medical Research Council
Đánh giá
Methodological quality of meta‐analyses: matched‐pairs comparison over time and between industry‐sponsored and academic‐sponsored reports
PW Lane, JPT Higgins, B Anagnostelis, J Anzures‐Cabrera, NF Baker, ...
Research Synthesis Methods 4 (4), 342-350, 2013
Các cơ quan ủy nhiệm: UK Medical Research Council
Đánh giá
Random‐effects meta‐analysis of time‐to‐event data using the expectation–maximisation algorithm and shrinkage estimators
MC Simmonds, JPT Higgins, LA Stewart
Research Synthesis Methods 4 (2), 144-155, 2013
Các cơ quan ủy nhiệm: UK Medical Research Council
Đánh giá
A structural description of biases that generate immortal time
MA Hernán, JAC Sterne, JPT Higgins, I Shrier, S Hernández-Díaz
Epidemiology 36 (1), 107-114, 2025
Các cơ quan ủy nhiệm: National Institute for Health Research, UK
Đánh giá
Investigating and dealing with publication bias and other reporting biases
MJ Page, JAC Sterne, JPT Higgins, M Egger
Systematic reviews in health research: meta‐analysis in context, 74-90, 2022
Các cơ quan ủy nhiệm: Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Đánh giá
Rate-constrained ranking and the rate-weighted AUC
LAC Millard, PA Flach, JPT Higgins
Joint European Conference on Machine Learning and Knowledge Discovery in …, 2014
Các cơ quan ủy nhiệm: UK Medical Research Council
Đánh giá
Assessment of systematic effects of methodological characteristics on candidate genetic associations
B Aljasir, JPA Ioannidis, A Yurkiewich, D Moher, JPT Higgins, P Arora, ...
Human genetics 132, 167-178, 2013
Các cơ quan ủy nhiệm: Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Có tại một số nơi: 217
Đánh giá
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement
D Moher, A Liberati, J Tetzlaff, DG Altman, t PRISMA Group*
Annals of internal medicine 151 (4), 264-269, 2009
Các cơ quan ủy nhiệm: Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Cancer Research UK
Đánh giá
The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
JPT Higgins, DG Altman, PC Gøtzsche, P Jüni, D Moher, AD Oxman, ...
bmj 343, 2011
Các cơ quan ủy nhiệm: Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Cancer Research UK
Đánh giá
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
JAC Sterne, J Savović, MJ Page, RG Elbers, NS Blencowe, I Boutron, ...
bmj 366, 2019
Các cơ quan ủy nhiệm: US National Institutes of Health, National Health and Medical Research …
Đánh giá
ROBINS-I: a tool for assessing risk of bias in non-randomised studies of interventions
JAC Sterne, MA Hernán, BC Reeves, J Savović, ND Berkman, ...
bmj 355, 2016
Các cơ quan ủy nhiệm: US National Institutes of Health, Cancer Research UK, UK Medical Research …
Đánh giá
Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials
JAC Sterne, AJ Sutton, JPA Ioannidis, N Terrin, DR Jones, J Lau, ...
Bmj 343, 2011
Các cơ quan ủy nhiệm: Canadian Institutes of Health Research, German Research Foundation, Cancer …
Đánh giá
Updated guidance for trusted systematic reviews: a new edition of the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions
M Cumpston, T Li, MJ Page, J Chandler, VA Welch, JPT Higgins, ...
The Cochrane database of systematic reviews 2019 (10), ED000142, 2019
Các cơ quan ủy nhiệm: US National Institutes of Health, National Institute for Health Research, UK
Chương trình máy tính sẽ tự động xác định thông tin xuất bản và thông tin về nhà tài trợ