[PDF][PDF] Ranking-based Argumentation Semantics Applied to Logical Argumentation.
In formal argumentation, a distinction can be made between extension-based semantics,
where sets of arguments are either (jointly) accepted or not, and ranking-based semantics …
where sets of arguments are either (jointly) accepted or not, and ranking-based semantics …
[HTML][HTML] Minimality, necessity and sufficiency for argumentation and explanation
We discuss explanations for formal (abstract and structured) argumentation–the question
whether and why a certain argument or claim can be accepted (or not) under various …
whether and why a certain argument or claim can be accepted (or not) under various …
[HTML][HTML] Comparing and extending the use of defeasible argumentation with quantitative data in real-world contexts
Dealing with uncertain, contradicting, and ambiguous information is still a central issue in
Artificial Intelligence (AI). As a result, many formalisms have been proposed or adapted so …
Artificial Intelligence (AI). As a result, many formalisms have been proposed or adapted so …
[HTML][HTML] A postulate-driven study of logical argumentation
Logical argumentation is a well-known approach to modeling non-monotonic reasoning with
conflicting information. In this paper we provide a comprehensive postulate-based study of …
conflicting information. In this paper we provide a comprehensive postulate-based study of …
Bisimulation between base argumentation and premise-conclusion argumentation
The structured argumentation system that represents arguments by premise-conclusion
pairs is called premise-conclusion argumentation (PA) and the one that represents …
pairs is called premise-conclusion argumentation (PA) and the one that represents …
Simple contrapositive assumption-based argumentation part II: Reasoning with preferences
Simple contrapositive assumption-based argumentation frameworks are a general setting
for structured argumentation, providing a robust approach to reasoning with arguments and …
for structured argumentation, providing a robust approach to reasoning with arguments and …
Towards an argumentative unification of default reasoning
We propose a novel knowledge representation method for the Default Logic paradigm by
develo** a proof calculus that yields arguments and counter-arguments in which defaults …
develo** a proof calculus that yields arguments and counter-arguments in which defaults …
[PDF][PDF] Towards deontic explanations through dialogue
Deontic explanations answer why-questions concerning agents' obligations and
permissions. Normative systems are notoriously conflict sensitive, making contrastive …
permissions. Normative systems are notoriously conflict sensitive, making contrastive …
Ranking-based Argumentation Semantics Applied to Logical Argumentation (full version)
In formal argumentation, a distinction can be made between extension-based semantics,
where sets of arguments are either (jointly) accepted or not, and ranking-based semantics …
where sets of arguments are either (jointly) accepted or not, and ranking-based semantics …
A Tutorial in Proof-Theoretic Approaches to Logical Argumentation
This article provides a tutorial in proof-theoretic approaches to logical argumentation. We
first introduce and discuss defeasible reasoning and nonmonotonic logic. This naturally …
first introduce and discuss defeasible reasoning and nonmonotonic logic. This naturally …