This article reviews legal applications of logic, with a particularly marked concern for logical
models of legal argument. We argue that the law is a rich test bed and important application …

In this paper, we extend Dung's seminal argument framework to form a probabilistic
argument framework by associating probabilities with arguments and defeats. We then …

In this paper, we address the problem of change in an abstract argumentation system. We
focus on a particular change: the addition of a new argument which interacts with previous …

Abstract argumentation (Dung 1995) is a theory of dialectic that allows us to formalise and
study various notions of argument acceptability. We depart from this standard approach and …

Persuasion is an activity that involves one party trying to induce another party to believe
something or to do something. It is an important and multifaceted human facility. Obviously …

A strategy is used by a participant in a persuasion dialogue to select locutions most likely to
achieve its objective of persuading its opponent. Such strategies often assume that the …

Abstract Argumentation-based negotiation describes the process of decision-making in multi-
agent systems through the exchange of arguments. If agents only have partial knowledge …

A popular view of what Artificial Intelligence can do for lawyers is that it can do no more than
deduce the consequences from a precisely stated set of facts and legal rules. This …

Modelling the Persuadee in Asymmetric Argumentation Dialogues for Persuasion Page 1
Modelling the Persuadee in Asymmetric Argumentation Dialogues for Persuasion Anthony …

In this paper, we address the problem of revising a Dung-style abstract argumentation
system, when we add a new argument which interacts with one previous argument. We …