Robotic-assisted vs. standard laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 19,731 patients

K Safiejko, R Tarkowski, M Koselak, M Juchimiuk… - Cancers, 2021 - mdpi.com
Simple Summary Surgery remains a mainstay of combined modality treatment at patients
with rectal cancer; however, there is a growing interest in using laparoscopic techniques …

Robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of eight studies

B **ong, L Ma, W Huang, Q Zhao, Y Cheng… - Journal of gastrointestinal …, 2015 - Elsevier
Background Robotic surgery has been used successfully in many branches of surgery, but
there is little evidence in the literature on its use in rectal cancer (RC). We conducted this …

Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a comparative study with laparoscopic surgery

EJ Park, MS Cho, SJ Baek, H Hur, BS Min… - Annals of …, 2015 - journals.lww.com
Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic
surgery for rectal cancer compared with laparoscopic surgery at a single institution …

Robotic resection is a good prognostic factor in rectal cancer compared with laparoscopic resection: long-term survival analysis using propensity score matching

J Kim, SJ Baek, DW Kang, YE Roh… - Diseases of the Colon …, 2017 - journals.lww.com
BACKGROUND: Robotic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer has rapidly increased
and has shown short-term outcomes comparable to conventional laparoscopic total …

Short and long-term outcomes of robotic versus laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: a case-matched retrospective study

MS Cho, SJ Baek, H Hur, BS Min, SH Baik, KY Lee… - Medicine, 2015 - journals.lww.com
The true benefits of robotic surgery are controversial, and whether robotic total mesorectal
excision (R-TME) can be justified as a standard treatment for rectal cancer patients needs to …

Robotic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: technical controversies and a systematic review on the perioperative, oncological, and functional outcomes

GN Piozzi, SH Kim - Annals of coloproctology, 2021 - pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Intersphincteric resection (ISR) is the ultimate anus-sparing technique for low rectal cancer
and is considered an oncologically safe alternative to abdominoperineal resection. The …

Robotic vs. laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a case matched study reporting a median of 7-year long-term oncological and functional …

V Aliyev, GN Piozzi, A Bulut, K Guven, B Bakir… - Updates in Surgery, 2022 - Springer
Aim of this study was to compare operative, long-term oncological and functional outcomes
of laparoscopic (LISR) and robotic (RISR) intersphincteric resection in low-lying rectal …

Robotic versus laparoscopic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis

Y Sun, H Xu, Z Li, J Han, W Song, J Wang… - World journal of surgical …, 2016 - Springer
Background The objective of this meta-analysis was to compare the clinical and oncologic
outcomes of robotic low anterior resection (R-LAR) with conventional laparoscopic low …

[HTML][HTML] Anus-preserving surgery in advanced low-lying rectal cancer: a perspective on oncological safety of intersphincteric resection

GN Piozzi, SJ Baek, JM Kwak, J Kim, SH Kim - Cancers, 2021 - mdpi.com
Simple Summary Intersphincteric resection (ISR) is the ultimate anus-preserving surgical
technique for very low-lying rectal cancers. The oncological safety of ISR has been …

Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis

KT Ng, AKV Tsia, VYL Chong - World journal of surgery, 2019 - Springer
Background Minimally invasive surgery has been considered as an alternative to open
surgery by surgeons for colorectal cancer. However, the efficacy and safety profiles of …