Wikipedia is the world's largest online encyclopedia, but maintaining article quality through
collaboration is challenging. Wikipedia designed a quality scale, but with such a manual …

Prior research on Wikipedia has characterized the growth in content and editors as being
fundamentally exponential in nature, extrapolating current trends into the future. We show …

We present a novel platform for supporting public deliberation on difficult decisions.
ConsiderIt guides people to reflect on tradeoffs and the perspectives of others by framing …

What we know about Wikipedia. A review of the literature analyzing the project(s). Page 1 What
we know about Wikipedia. A review of the literature analyzing the project(s). Nicolas Jullien∗ …

In the past few decades, the task of judging the credibility of information has shifted from
trained professionals (eg, editors) to end users of information (eg, casual Internet users) …

In this short introductory piece, we define open collaboration and contextualize the diverse
articles in this special issue in a common vocabulary and history. We provide a definition of …

The success of Wikipedia as a large-scale collaborative effort has spurred researchers to
examine the motivations and behaviors of Wikipedia's participants. However, this research …

Successful online communities have complex cooperative arrangements, articulations of
work, and integration practices. They require technical infrastructure to support a broad …

Wikipedia is one of the most visited sites on the Web and a common source of information
for many users. As an encyclopedia, Wikipedia was not conceived as a source of original …

Collaborative content creation inevitably reaches situations where different points of view
lead to conflict. We focus on Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia anyone may edit, where …