Safety assurance cases (ACs) are structured arguments designed to comprehensively show
that a system is safe. ACs are often model-based, meaning that a model of the system is a …

In critical software engineering, structured assurance cases (ACs) are used to demonstrate
how key properties (eg, safety, security) are supported by evidence artifacts (eg, test results …

In recent decades, cyber-physical systems developed using Model-Driven Engineering
(MDE) techniques have become ubiquitous in safety-critical domains. Safety assurance …

Safety standards from different domains recommend the execution of a process for kee**
the system safety case up to date, whenever the system undergoes a change, however …

As the complexity of safety-critical systems increases, it becomes more and more
challenging to assure that these systems will operate safely and reliably. This has led to the …

Abstract Safety Assurance Cases (ACs) are structured arguments which demonstrate that a
system fulfills its safety requirements. However, the reasoning used in ACs is often …

As automotive manufacturers continue to release more advanced autonomous features, the
effort required to ensure safety is increasing. This is a result of the growing complexity of …

In safety-critical software engineering, stakeholders require assurance that soft-ware
products will operate as intended. Several industries (eg, automotive), have developed …

Safety cases play a pivotal role in ensuring system reliability and acceptability, providing a
structured argument supported by evidence. However, gaps in safety case literature hinder …

In the realm of safety-critical systems, justifying their safety prior to deployment is not just a
necessity, but a mandate. Hence, the creation of compelling safety cases becomes a …