How do referees integrate evaluation criteria into their overall judgment? Evidence from grant peer review

SE Hug - Scientometrics, 2024 - Springer
Little is known whether peer reviewers use the same evaluation criteria and how they
integrate the criteria into their overall judgment. This study therefore proposed two …

Targeted, actionable and fair: Reviewer reports as feedback and its effect on ECR career choices

GE Derrick, A Zimmermann, H Greaves… - Research …, 2023 - academic.oup.com
Previous studies of the use of peer review for the allocation of competitive funding agencies
have concentrated on questions of efficiency and how to make the 'best'decision, by …

Peer review's irremediable flaws: Scientists' perspectives on grant evaluation in Germany

E Barlösius, L Paruschke, A Philipps - Research Evaluation, 2023 - academic.oup.com
Peer review has developed over time to become the established procedure for assessing
and assuring the scientific quality of research. Nevertheless, the procedure has also been …

Promoting equality, diversity and inclusion in research and funding: reflections from a digital manufacturing research network

OJ Fisher, D Fearnshaw, NJ Watson, P Green… - Research Integrity and …, 2024 - Springer
Background Equal, diverse, and inclusive teams lead to higher productivity, creativity, and
greater problem-solving ability resulting in more impactful research. However, there is a gap …

Perceptions of grant peer reviewers: a mixed methods study

KB Schmaling, GR Evenson, BK Marble… - Research …, 2024 - academic.oup.com
Peer review is integral to the evaluation of grant proposals. Reviewer perceptions and
characteristics have received limited study, especially their associations with reviewers' …

Research in Latin America: bases for the foundation of a training program in higher education

M Marino-Jiménez, IL Ramírez-Durand… - Cogent …, 2024 - Taylor & Francis
Research is a common feature in developed countries. Those who dedicate themselves to
this activity produce important tools for individual, community, and national development …

DecentPeeR: A Self-Incentivised & Inclusive Decentralized Peer Review System

J Gruendler, D Melnyk… - … on Blockchain and …, 2024 - ieeexplore.ieee.org
Peer review, as a widely used practice to ensure the quality and integrity of publications,
lacks a well-defined and common mechanism to self-incentivize virtuous behavior across all …

Peer reviewers' conflicts of interest in biomedical research: sco** review

CB Korfitsen, CH Nejstgaard, A Hróbjartsson… - BMJ Evidence-Based …, 2025 - ebm.bmj.com
Background Peer review may improve the quality of research manuscripts and aid in
editorial decisions, but reviewers can have conflicts of interest that impact on their …

Peer reviewer topic choice and its impact on interrater reliability: A mixed-method study

T Feliciani, J Luo, K Shankar - Quantitative Science Studies, 2022 - direct.mit.edu
One of the main critiques of academic peer review is that interrater reliability (IRR) among
reviewers is low. We examine an underinvestigated factor possibly contributing to low IRR …

[HTML][HTML] Role, function, and expectations of research funding committees: Perspectives from committee members

A Blatch-Jones, C Boxall, K Meadmore - F1000Research, 2025 - f1000research.com
Research funding committees play an integral role in the research funding process,
consisting of a range of skills, knowledge, and expertise (eg, professional, and public …