Assigning paper to suitable reviewers is of great significance to ensure the accuracy and
fairness of peer review results. In the past three decades, many researchers have made a …

Appropriate reviewer assignment significantly impacts the quality of proposal evaluation, as
accurate and fair reviews are contingent on their assignment to relevant reviewers. The …

In this study, we propose the architecture of a content-based recommender system aimed at
the selection of reviewers (experts) to evaluate research proposals or articles. We introduce …

The assignment of appropriate reviewers to academic articles, known as the reviewer
assignment problem (RAP), has become a crucial issue in academia. While there has been …

As many academic conferences are overwhelmed by a rapidly increasing number of paper
submissions, automatically finding appropriate reviewers for each submission becomes a …

Assigning appropriate reviewers to a manuscript from a pool of candidate reviewers is a
common challenge in the academic community. Current word-and semantic-based …

Reviewing is the most important step in the quality accreditation of scientific works, requires
the professional expertise of the reviewer as well as there is no conflict of interest in the …

With the rapid increase in paper submissions to academic conferences, the need for
automated and accurate paper-reviewer matching is more critical than ever. Previous efforts …

In this study, we propose a hybrid knowledge-based framework for author name
disambiguation. The developed approach helps incrementally identify authors of documents …

Reviewer assignment to papers is one of the most significant stages of the scientific
publishing process. It determines whether high-quality scientific papers are accepted for …