In the last decades, most works in the literature have been devoted to study argumentation
formalisms that focus on a defeat relation among arguments. Recently, the study of a support …

Different abstract argumentation frameworks have been used for various applications within
multi-agents systems. Among them, bipolar frameworks make use of both attack and support …

Background Scientific publications are documentary representations of defeasible
arguments, supported by data and repeatable methods. They are the essential mediating …

Random forests are decision tree ensembles that can be used to solve a variety of machine
learning problems. However, as the number of trees and their individual size can be large …

In dialogical argumentation, it is often assumed that the involved parties will always correctly
identify the intended statements posited by each other and realize all of the associated …

The paper tackled the issue of arguments evaluation in weighted bipolar argumentation
graphs (ie, graphs whose arguments have basic strengths, and may be both supported and …

In this paper, we introduce argumentation frameworks with necessities (AFNs), an extension
of Dung's argumentation frameworks (AFs) taking into account a necessity relation as a kind …

With the growing use of the Social Web, an increasing number of applications for
exchanging opinions with other people are becoming available online. These applications …

The paper studies how arguments can be eval-uated inweighted bipolar argumentation
graphs (ie, graphs whose arguments have basic weightsand may be supported and …

This paper introduces epistemic graphs as a generalization of the epistemic approach to
probabilistic argumentation. In these graphs, an argument can be believed or disbelieved up …