Collaborative intellectual engagement is held in high regard in contemporary educational
thought as a pedagogical practice of broad value to K–12 students. To what extent is this …

Reasoning is generally seen as a means to improve knowledge and make better decisions.
However, much evidence shows that reasoning often leads to epistemic distortions and poor …

This article describes the ICAP framework that defines cognitive engagement activities on
the basis of students' overt behaviors and proposes that engagement behaviors can be …

This paper provides a rationale for the changes advocated by the Framework for K-12
Science Education and the Next Generation Science Standards. It provides an argument for …

Names: Mercer, Neil, editor.| Wegerif, Rupert, 1959-editor.| Major, Louis,(Louis Christopher),
1985-editor. Title: The Routledge international handbook of research on dialogic …

There is increasing consensus among psycho-educational scholars about argumentation as
a means to improve student knowledge and understanding of subject matter. In this article …

Argument and debate are common in science, yet they are virtually absent from science
education. Recent research shows, however, that opportunities for students to engage in …

Cover--Half-title--Title page--Copyright--Dedication--Table of contents--List of Tables and
Figures--Tables--Figures--Foreword--Preface--References--Acknowledgements--1 …

Dialogue, as a communication form characterized by its commitment to inclusiveness and
rationality, has long been advocated by educators as a mechanism for hel** students …

Computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) is often based on written argumentative
discourse of learners, who discuss their perspectives on a problem with the goal to acquire …