Abstract Russellians, Relationists, and Fregeans disagree about the nature of propositional‐
attitude content. We articulate a framework to characterize and evaluate this disagreement …

Among the virtues of relationist approaches to Frege's puzzle is that they put us in a position
to outline structural features of the puzzle that were only implicit in earlier work. In particular …

Frege's puzzle is a fundamental challenge for accounts of mental and linguistic
representation. This piece surveys a family of recent approaches to the puzzle that posit …

Fregeanism and Relationism are competing families of solutions to Frege's Puzzle, and by
extension, competing theories of propositional representation. My aim is to clarify what is at …

Many philosophers have argued or taken for granted that Frege's puzzle has little or nothing
to do with identity statements. I show that this is wrong, arguing that the puzzle can only be …

This volume explores linguistic reference. Reference is a two-place relation. One relata
refers, the other (the referent) is referred to. Candidate referring items include, among others …

Soames thinks the dependencies show up in the semantics if they are generated by variable
binding. That will only partially overlap with Pinillos's ambitions for the notion of de jure …

Frege's Puzzle is a founding problem in analytic philosophy. It lies at the intersection of
central topics in the philosophy of language and mind: the theory of reference, the nature of …

Semantic relationism is a family of semantic theories, each of which presents an alternative
to traditional Fregean and Millian-inspired accounts of de jure coreference. This entry …

This thesis investigates the nature of the relation between mental representations in
successful verbal communication, thought attribution, agreement, and disagreement—a …