Wrongful conviction databases have shed light on the fact that innocent people can be
induced to confess to crimes they did not commit. Drawing on police practices, core …

Why do so many people voluntarily consent to searches by have the police search their
person or vehicle when they know that they are carrying contraband or evidence of illegal …

Miranda's' familiar regime of warnings and waivers was intended to afford custodial suspects
an informed and unfettered choice between speech and silence and, at the same time …

Individuals with a diagnosis of fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (FASD) experience a range of
physical, cognitive, and behavioral deficits thought to interfere with their ability to …

By law, before interrrogating a suspect who is in custody, the police should inform them of
their Miranda rights—the rights against self-incrimination and to an attorney. When a suspect …

This study examined juvenile justice-involved youths' understanding and appreciation of the
Miranda warnings' rights to silence and legal counsel using the Miranda Rights …

The current article presents a series of commentaries on urgent issues and prospects in
reforming interrogation practices in Canada and the United States. Researchers and …

The purpose of the Miranda rights in the USA is to ensure that suspects know their
fundamental rights under the law, yet even native speakers of English do not always …

Some states and police agencies require youth to consult with parents before or during
interrogation by police, yet these policies rely on the untested assumption that parents …

Abstract Miranda v. Arizona (384 US 436, 1966) required that suspects be explicitly warned
of the right to avoid self-incrimination and the right to legal representation. This research was …