Scripts for computer-supported collaborative learning (CSCL) offer socio-cognitive
scaffolding for learners to engage in collaborative activities that are considered beneficial for …

Scientific reasoning and scientific argumentation are highly valued outcomes of K-12 and
higher education. In this article, we first review main topics and key findings of three different …

This study compared the effects of support for peer feedback, peer feedforward and their
combination on students' peer learning processes, argumentative essay quality and domain …

The goal of argumentation mining, an evolving research field in computational linguistics, is
to design methods capable of analyzing people's argumentation. In this article, we go …

This article presents an outline of a script theory of guidance for computer-supported
collaborative learning (CSCL). With its 4 types of components of internal and external scripts …

The advantages offered by natural language processing (NLP) and machine learning
enable students to receive automated feedback on their argumentation skills, independent …

Techniques from Natural-Language-Processing offer the opportunities to design new dialog-
based forms of human-computer interaction as well as to analyze the argumentation quality …

Despite the potential of learning analytics for personalized learning, it has seldom been
used to support collaborative learning particularly in face-to-face (F2F) learning contexts …

Cover--Half-title--Title page--Copyright--Dedication--Table of contents--List of Tables and
Figures--Tables--Figures--Foreword--Preface--References--Acknowledgements--1 …

We propose a new task in the field of computational argumentation in which we investigate
qualitative properties of Web arguments, namely their convincingness. We cast the problem …