Abstract 'Journal quality'is by nature, a dynamic and multidimensional concept that is
influenced by many factors. So far, no studies have been conducted to examine the …

The current publishing landscape grapples with opacity in the review process. In response,
a proposal for a blockchain-driven system is put forth to establish transparent and auditable …

Is it possible to reliably evaluate the quality of peer reviews? We study this question driven
by two primary motivations--incentivizing high-quality reviewing using assessed quality of …

Reviewers do not only help editors to screen manuscripts for publication in academic
journals; they also serve to increase the rigor and value of manuscripts by constructive …

This article describes the outcomes of a survey of 93 editors in chief and associate editors of
behavior‐analytic journals. We sought information about variables that influence their …

We conducted an experiment during the review process of the 2023 International
Conference on Machine Learning (ICML) that requested authors with multiple submissions …

Peer reviews play a vital role in academic publishing. Authors have various feelings towards
peer reviews. This study analyzes the experiences shared by authors in Scirev. org to …

Amidst the ever-expanding realm of scientific production and the proliferation of predatory
journals, the focus on peer review remains paramount for scientometricians and sociologists …

This study explores the relationship between a journal's ranking and the reviewer's
academic impact through extracting bibliometric information about reviewers for the top …

Scientometers and sociologists of science have spilled much ink on the topic of peer review
over the past twenty years, given its primordial role in a context marked by the exponential …