Page 1 THE ETHICS OF RISK ETHICAL ANALYSIS |N AN UNCERTAIN WORLD SVEN OVE
HANSSON Page 2 The Ethics of Risk Page 3 Also by Sven Ove Hansson SETTING THE …

Recent studies have focused on autonomous agents that select their own goals and then
select actions to achieve these goals, using online Goal Reasoning (GR). GR agents can …

In this paper I argue that deontic modals are hyperintensional, ie logically equivalent
contents cannot be substituted in their scope. I give two arguments, one deductive and the …

Contrastivism about some concept says that the concept is relativized to sets of alternatives.
Relative to some alternatives, the concept may apply, but relative to others, it may not. This …

We combine linear temporal logic (with both past and future modalities) with a deontic
version of justification logic to provide a framework for reasoning about time and epistemic …

Can security automata (robots and AIs) make moral decisions to apply force on humans
correctly? If they can make such decisions, ought they be used to do so? Will security …

Modal logics are widely used in multi-agent systems to reason about actions, abilities,
norms, or epistemic states. Combined with description logic languages, they are also a …

A new formal representation of supererogation is presented. Its basic idea is that a
supererogatory action is an optional action that is a better variant of another, obligatory …

Aggregative deontic detachment is a new form of deontic detachment that keeps track of
previously detached obligations. We argue that it handles iteration of successive …

Contrastivism about 'ought'holds that 'ought'claims are relativized, at least implicitly, to sets
of mutually exclusive but not necessarily jointly exhaustive alternatives. This kind of theory …