Systematic reviews are comprehensive literature reviews for a highly focused research
question. These reviews are considered the highest form of evidence in medicine. Complex …

Systematic literature reviews play a vital role in identifying the best available evidence for
health and social care research, policy, and practice. The resources required to produce …

Conducting a systematic review is a widely used method to obtain an overview over the
current scientific consensus on a topic of interest, by bringing together multiple studies in a …

Systematic reviews are crucial for evidence-based medicine as they comprehensively
analyse published research findings on specific questions. Conducting such reviews is often …

Document screening is a fundamental task within Evidence-based Medicine (EBM), a
practice that provides scientific evidence to support medical decisions. Several approaches …

Screening prioritisation in medical systematic reviews aims to rank the set of documents
retrieved by complex Boolean queries. Prioritising the most important documents ensures …

The goal of screening prioritisation in systematic reviews is to identify relevant documents
with high recall and rank them in early positions for review. This saves reviewing effort if …

Systematic literature reviews (SLRs) are a cornerstone of academic research, yet they are
often labour-intensive and time-consuming due to the detailed literature curation process …

Systematic medical reviews are a method to collect the findings from multiple studies in a
reliable way. Given budget and time constraints, limiting the recall of a search may …

Coordination level matching is a ranking method originally proposed to rank documents
given Boolean queries that is now several decades old. Rank fusion is a relatively recent …