The rationality paradox centers on the observation that people are highly intelligent, yet
show evidence of errors and biases in their thinking when measured against normative …

Conditionals and conditional reasoning are everywhere in ordinary and scientific discourse.
Ordinary people, politicians, civil engineers, and scientific consultants all have an interest in …

The present research examines descriptive models of probabilistic conditional reasoning,
that is of reasoning from uncertain conditionals with contents about which reasoners have …

The belief-bias effect is one of the most-studied biases in reasoning. A recent study of the
phenomenon using the signal detection theory (SDT) model called into question all …

Conditionals and conditional reasoning have been a long-standing focus of research across
a number of disciplines, ranging from psychology through linguistics to philosophy. But …

Indicative and counterfactual conditionals are central to reasoning in general and causal
reasoning in particular. Normative theorists and psychologists have held a range of views on …

Conditionals and conditional reasoning are fundamental in all studies of reasoning, in logic,
philosophy, and psychology. Any inference, from A (perhaps a long conjunction of premises) …

Human reasoning is fallible when judged against normative standards, such as the
conventions of logic. Although people are sometimes capable of impressive acts of …

Statements of the form if… then… can be used to communicate conditional speech acts such
as tips and promises. Conditional promises require the speaker to have perceived control …

Reasoning research has long been associated with paper and pencil tasks in which
peoples' reasoning skills are judged against established normative conventions. However …