In recent years there has been an increasing interest in extending Dung's framework to
facilitate the knowledge representation and reasoning process. In this paper, we present an …

Abstract Dung's abstract Argumentation Framework (AF) has emerged as a central
formalism in the area of knowledge representation and reasoning. Preferences in AF allow …

Dung's Argumentation Framework (AF) has been extended in several directions. Among the
numerous proposed extensions, three of them seem to be of particular interest and have …

ABSTRACT Dung's Abstract Argumentation Framework (AAF) has emerged as a central
formalism in AI for modeling disputes among agents. In this paper, we introduce an …

Dealing with controversial information is an important issue in several application contexts.
Formal argumentation enables reasoning on arguments for and against a claim to decide on …

We propose a new paradigm for reasoning over abstract argumentation frameworks where
the “who said what” relation, associating each argument with the set of agents who claimed …

We recall percVer and percAcc, the problems asking for the percentages of the completions
of an incomplete Abstract Argumentation Framework (iAAF) where a set S is an extension …

Abstract Epistemic Abstract Argumentation Framework (EAAF) extends Dung's framework
(AAF)—a central formalism in AI for modeling disputes among agents—by allowing the …

Dung's abstract Argumentation Framework (AF) has emerged as a key formalism for
argumentation in artificial intelligence. It has been extended in several directions, including …

ABSTRACT Epistemic Abstract Argumentation Framework (EAAF) extends Dung's
framework (AAF) by allowing the representation of epistemic attacks. So far, the semantics of …