Interdisciplinary interest in affordances is increasing. This paper is a philosophical
contribution. The question is: Do persons offer affordances? Analysis of the concepts …

This book brings together philosophers to investigate the nature and normativity of group
disagreement. Debates in the epistemology of disagreement have mainly been concerned …

In this paper we articulate a characterization of the concept of disease as a social problem.
We argue that, from a social ontology point of view, diseases are problems that are identified …

This thesis explores the range of discourses in which parents and professionals engage
when a child is assessed and diagnosed with autism. The main focus is on the parents' …

In this article, I argue that a capacity for mindreading conceived along the line of simulation
theory provides the cognitive basis for forming we-centric representations of actions and …

We ordinarily attribute beliefs and other intentional states to collective entities. These
attributions can be vindicated from a theoretical perspective that holds that:(i) collective …

Teleosemantic theories aspire to develop a naturalistic account of intentional agency and
thought by appeal to biological teleology. In particular, most versions of teleosemantics …

Our purpose in this paper is to contribute to a practice-based characterization of scientific
inference. We want to explore whether Brandom's pragmatist–inferentialist framework can …

In this paper we articulate a characterization of the concept of disease as a social problem.
We argue that, from a social ontology point of view, diseases are problems that are identified …

The question we want to address is what it takes for groups to constitute rational epistemic
agents. The members of a group often hold disagreeing views. How can a group rationally …