Judgment aggregation is a mathematical theory of collective decision-making. It concerns
the methods whereby individual opinions about logically interconnected issues of interest …

We analyse the computational complexity of three problems in judgment aggregation:(1)
computing a collective judgment from a profile of individual judgments (the winner …

We provide a comprehensive analysis of the computational complexity of the outcome
determination problem for the most important aggregation rules proposed in the literature on …

We present a model of collective decision making in which aggregation and deliberation are
treated simultaneously. Individuals debate in a public forum and potentially revise their …

This paper introduces a new class of judgment aggregation rules, to be called 'scoring rules'
after their famous counterparts in preference aggregation theory. A scoring rule generates …

Judgment aggregation is a collective decision making framework where the opinions of a
group of agents is combined into a collective opinion. This can be done using many different …

Judgment aggregation offers a generic formal logical framework for modeling various
settings where agents must reach joint agreements through aggregating the preferences …

The literature on judgment aggregation is moving from studying impossibility results
regarding aggregation rules towards studying specific judgment aggregation rules. Here we …

Binary aggregation studies problems in which individuals express yes/no choices over a
number of possibly correlated issues, and these individual choices need to be aggregated …

Rational deliberation helps to avoid cyclic or intransitive group preferences by fostering
meta-agreements, which in turn ensures single-peaked profiles. This is the received view …