Logics for defeasible argumentation

H Prakken, G Vreeswijk - Handbook of philosophical logic, 2002 - Springer
Logic is the science that deals with the formal principles and criteria of validity of patterns of
inference. This chapter surveys logics for a particular group of patterns of inference, namely …

Logical models of argument

CI Chesnevar, AG Maguitman, RP Loui - ACM Computing Surveys …, 2000 - dl.acm.org
Logical models of arguement formalize commonsense reasoning while taking process and
computation seriously. This survey discusses the main ideas that characterize different …

Argumentation in artificial intelligence

TJM Bench-Capon, PE Dunne - Artificial intelligence, 2007 - Elsevier
Over the last ten years, argumentation has come to be increasingly central as a core study
within Artificial Intelligence (AI). The articles forming this volume reflect a variety of important …

On the complexity of solving Markov decision problems

ML Littman, TL Dean, LP Kaelbling - arxiv preprint arxiv:1302.4971, 2013 - arxiv.org
Markov decision problems (MDPs) provide the foundations for a number of problems of
interest to AI researchers studying automated planning and reinforcement learning. In this …

A logic-based theory of deductive arguments

P Besnard, A Hunter - Artificial Intelligence, 2001 - Elsevier
We explore a framework for argumentation (based on classical logic) in which an argument
is a pair where the first item in the pair is a minimal consistent set of formulae that proves the …

On the evaluation of argumentation formalisms

M Caminada, L Amgoud - Artificial Intelligence, 2007 - Elsevier
Argumentation theory has become an important topic in the field of AI. The basic idea is to
construct arguments in favor and against a statement, to select the “acceptable” ones and …

A framework for argumentation-based negotiation

C Sierra, NR Jennings, P Noriega… - International Workshop on …, 1997 - Springer
Many autonomous agents operate in domains in which the cooperation of their fellow agents
cannot be guaranteed. In such domains negotiation is essential to persuade others of the …

Inferring from inconsistency in preference-based argumentation frameworks

L Amgoud, C Cayrol - Journal of Automated Reasoning, 2002 - Springer
Abstract Argumentation is a promising approach to handle inconsistent knowledge bases,
based on the justification of plausible conclusions by arguments. Because of inconsistency …

Acceptability semantics for weighted argumentation frameworks

L Amgoud, J Ben-Naim, D Doder, S Vesic - Twenty-Sixth International …, 2017 - hal.science
The paper studies semantics that evaluate arguments in argumentation graphs, where each
argument has a basic strength, and may be attacked by other arguments. It starts by defining …

On the acceptability of arguments in preference-based argumentation

L Amgoud, C Cayrol - arxiv preprint arxiv:1301.7358, 2013 - arxiv.org
Argumentation is a promising model for reasoning with uncertain knowledge. The key
concept of acceptability enables to differentiate arguments and counterarguments: The …