Reasoning is generally seen as a means to improve knowledge and make better decisions.
However, much evidence shows that reasoning often leads to epistemic distortions and poor …

There is increasing consensus among psycho-educational scholars about argumentation as
a means to improve student knowledge and understanding of subject matter. In this article …

The goal of argumentation mining, an evolving research field in computational linguistics, is
to design methods capable of analyzing people's argumentation. In this article, we go …

Cover--Half-title--Title page--Copyright--Dedication--Table of contents--List of Tables and
Figures--Tables--Figures--Foreword--Preface--References--Acknowledgements--1 …

Dialogue, as a communication form characterized by its commitment to inclusiveness and
rationality, has long been advocated by educators as a mechanism for hel** students …

The aim of this study was to assess whether and how a sustained instructional focus on
argumentation might improve children's understanding and application of key epistemic …

We examine how extended engagement in argumentation with peers leads to enhanced
metalevel understanding of argumentive discourse. Following such engagement, young …

Classical informal reasoning “fallacies,” for example, begging the question or arguing from
ignorance, while ubiquitous in everyday argumentation, have been subject to little …

Growing evidence indicates that our higher rational capacities depend on social interaction—
that only through engaging with others do we acquire the ability to evaluate beliefs as true or …

Critical thinking is identified as a key educational outcome in higher education curricula;
however, it is not trivial to support students in building this multifaceted skill. In this study, we …