I draw on neurobiological evidence to defend the rationalist thesis that moral judgments are
essentially dependent on reasoning, not emotions (conceived as distinct from inference) …

Disagreement is a common feature of a social world. For various reasons, however, we
sometimes need to resolve a disagreement into a single set of opinions. This can be …

Michael Huemer argues that cross-cultural convergence toward liberal moral values is
evidence of objective moral progress, and by extension, evidence for moral realism. Nathan …

The dominant theory of the evolution of moral cognition across a variety of fields is that moral
cognition is a biological adaptation to foster social cooperation. This chapter argues, to the …

This book investigates the relationship between our present and future selves. It focuses
specifically on diachronic self-regarding decisions: choices involving our earlier and later …

This paper presents a new trilemma with respect to resolving the control and alignment
problems in machine ethics. Section 1 outlines three possible types of artificial moral agents …

This chapter details three sources of normative moral disagreement and surveys 11
approaches to understanding its implications for normative ethics. Section 2 explains how …

In this essay, I reply to an influential objection to evolutionary debunking arguments against
moral realism. According to this objection, our capacity for autonomous rational reflection …

Conservatives and progressives rarely agree on much—but one thing many agree upon is
that it's not OK to be a moderate. This book shows they are wrong. In Why It's OK to be a …

Moral Blackmail: Coercion, Responsibility, and Global Justice identifies a novel kind of
forced action, yet one that is relatively neglected in ethics and moral philosophy. Moral …