Intervertebral disc diseases PART 2: a review of the current diagnostic and treatment strategies for intervertebral disc disease

PH Wu, HS Kim, IT Jang - International journal of molecular sciences, 2020 - mdpi.com
With an aging population, there is a proportional increase in the prevalence of intervertebral
disc diseases. Intervertebral disc diseases are the leading cause of lower back pain and …

Perioperative outcomes and adverse events of minimally invasive versus open posterior lumbar fusion: meta-analysis and systematic review

CL Goldstein, K Macwan, K Sundararajan… - … of Neurosurgery: Spine, 2016 - thejns.org
OBJECT The objective of this study was to determine the clinical comparative effectiveness
and adverse event rates of posterior minimally invasive surgery (MIS) compared with open …

Minimally invasive robotic versus open fluoroscopic-guided spinal instrumented fusions: a randomized controlled trial

SJ Hyun, KJ Kim, TA Jahng, HJ Kim - 2017 - journals.lww.com
Study Design. A prospective randomized clinical trial. Objective. To compare the impact of
robotic guidance in a minimally invasive spine surgery (MIS) to a fluoroscopy-guided open …

Clinical and radiological outcomes of open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion

KH Lee, WM Yue, W Yeo, H Soeharno, SB Tan - European spine journal, 2012 - Springer
Study design Prospective observational cohort study. Objective Comparison of clinical and
radiological outcomes of single-level open versus minimally invasive (MIS) transforaminal …

Five-year outcomes of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a matched-pair comparison study

C Seng, MA Siddiqui, KPL Wong, K Zhang, W Yeo… - Spine, 2013 - journals.lww.com
Study Design. Retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. Objective. To compare
midterm clinical and radiological outcomes of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) versus open …

Minimally invasive surgery: lateral approach interbody fusion: results and review

JA Youssef, PC McAfee, CA Patty, E Raley… - Spine, 2010 - journals.lww.com
Study Design. A retrospective review of patients treated at 2 institutions with anterior lumbar
interbody fusion using a minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal approach, and review of …

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a review of techniques and outcomes

IO Karikari, RE Isaacs - Spine, 2010 - journals.lww.com
Study Design. Review of published literature. Objective. To review the available medical
literature reporting results after minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion …

[HTML][HTML] Minimally invasive spine surgery: techniques, technologies, and indications

J Park, DW Ham, BT Kwon, SM Park, HJ Kim… - Asian spine …, 2020 - ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Over the past few decades, interest in minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) has
increased tremendously due to its core principle of minimizing approach-related injury while …

Comparison of complication rates of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and lateral lumbar interbody fusion: a systematic review of the literature

JR Joseph, BW Smith, F La Marca, P Park - Neurosurgical focus, 2015 - thejns.org
OBJECT Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MI-TLIF) and lateral
lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) are 2 currently popular techniques for lumbar arthrodesis …

Minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a meta-analysis based on the current evidence

NF Tian, YS Wu, XL Zhang, HZ Xu, YL Chi… - European Spine …, 2013 - Springer
Purpose This is a meta-analysis of randomized and non-randomized studies comparing the
clinical and radiological efficacy of minimally invasive (MI) and conventional open …