In Dungs seminal work, an argumentation framework was defined by a set of abstract
arguments and a binary (and also abstract) relation between these arguments, called attack …

We present various new concepts and results related to abstract dialectical frameworks
(ADFs), a powerful generalization of Dung's argumentation frameworks (AFs). In particular …

The issue of representing attacks to attacks in argumentation is receiving an increasing
attention as a useful conceptual modelling tool in several contexts. In this paper we present …

In 2005 the author introduced networks which allow attacks on attacks of any level. So if a→
b reads a attacks b, then this attack can itself be attacked by another node c. This attack itself …

In this paper, we consider two drawbacks of Cayrol and Lagasque-Schiex's meta-
argumentation theory to model bipolar argumentation frameworks. We consider first the “lost …

This paper tackles the fundamental questions arising when looking at argumentation
frameworks as interacting components, characterized by an Input/Output behavior, rather …

The abstract nature of Dung's theory of argumentation accounts for its wide-spread
application as a general framework for various species of non-monotonic reasoning, and …

This article provides a short survey of some of the most popular abstract argumentation
frameworks available today. The authors present the general idea of abstract argumentation …

This paper is part of a research program centered around argumentation networks and
offering several research directions for argumentation networks, with a view of using such …

Abstract Cayrol and Lagasquie-Schiex introduce bipolar argumentation frameworks by
introducing a second relation on the arguments for representing the support among them …