Why can testimony alone be enough for findings of liability? Why statistical evidence alone
can't? These questions underpin the 'Proof Paradox'. Many epistemologists have attempted …

Recent years have seen fresh impetus brought to debates about the proper role of statistical
evidence in the law. Recent work largely centers on a set of puzzles known as the “proof …

Legal epistemology seems to be exploding. More and more philosophers seem to be taking
an interest in the theory of evidence law, and to bring along with them to legal theory the …

A question, long discussed by legal scholars, has recently provoked a considerable amount
of philosophical attention:'Is it ever appropriate to base a legal verdict on statistical evidence …

This paper defends the heretical view that sometimes we ought to assign legal liability
based on statistical evidence alone. Recent literature focuses on potential unfairness to the …

This chapter introduces the 'she said, he said'paradox for Title IX investigations.'She said, he
said'cases are accusations of rape, followed by denials, with no further significant case …

Wordly internalists claim that while internal duplicates always share the same evidence, our
evidence includes non-trivial propositions about our environment. It follows that some …

Must rational thinkers have consistent sets of beliefs? I shall argue that it can be rational for
a thinker to believe a set of propositions known to be inconsistent. If this is right, an important …

Criminal courts make decisions that can remove the liberty and even life of those accused.
Civil trials can cause the bankruptcy of companies employing thousands of people, asylum …

In this paper, we put forth an analysis of sensitivity which aims to discern individual from
merely statistical evidence. We argue that sensitivity is not to be understood as a factive …