In this paper we present US2016, the largest publicly available set of corpora of annotated
dialogical argumentation. The annotation covers argumentative relations, dialogue acts and …

Argument schemes are abstractions substantiating the inferential connection between
premise (s) and conclusion in argumentative communication. Identifying such conventional …

Despite questions having a long-standing history in theoretical linguistics, the interface
between empirically grounded corpus linguistics of questioning behaviour and analytically …

In this paper, we present an in-depth comparative analysis of two classifications of argument
schemes: Walton's typology and Wagemans' Periodic Table of Arguments. We describe …

In the spirit of the pragmatic account of quotation and reporting offered by Macagno and
Walton (2017), we outline a systematic pragmatic account of rephrasing. For this purpose …

Following the establishment in 2006 of a representational standard for the computational
handling of structures of argumentation, the Argument Interchange Format, it became …

We present intertextual correspondence (ITC) as an integrative technique for combining
annotated text corpora. The topical correspondence between different texts can be exploited …

When making arguments during public consultations, disputants tend to rephrase their
premises and conclusions. Citizen Dialogue corpus comprises of transcripts of public …

In this paper we consider the insights that can be gained by considering large scale
argument networks and the complex interactions between their constituent propositions. We …

This book covers the topic of discourse and argumentation in archaeology with an aim to
serve the archaeology community. The book presents discourse and argument analysis …