Factor models, machine learning, and asset pricing

S Giglio, B Kelly, D **u - Annual Review of Financial Economics, 2022 - annualreviews.org
We survey recent methodological contributions in asset pricing using factor models and
machine learning. We organize these results based on their primary objectives: estimating …

Financial decision-making in markets and firms: A behavioral perspective

WFM De Bondt, RH Thaler - Handbooks in operations research and …, 1995 - Elsevier
Publisher Summary This chapter provides a selective review of recent work in behavioral
finance. Modern finance assumes that the study of substantively rational solutions to …

Financial machine learning

B Kelly, D **u - Foundations and Trends® in Finance, 2023 - nowpublishers.com
We survey the nascent literature on machine learning in the study of financial markets. We
highlight the best examples of what this line of research has to offer and recommend …

Empirical asset pricing via machine learning

S Gu, B Kelly, D **u - The Review of Financial Studies, 2020 - academic.oup.com
We perform a comparative analysis of machine learning methods for the canonical problem
of empirical asset pricing: measuring asset risk premiums. We demonstrate large economic …

Replicating anomalies

K Hou, C Xue, L Zhang - The Review of financial studies, 2020 - academic.oup.com
Most anomalies fail to hold up to currently acceptable standards for empirical finance. With
microcaps mitigated via NYSE breakpoints and value-weighted returns, 65% of the 452 …

Taming the factor zoo: A test of new factors

G Feng, S Giglio, D **u - The Journal of Finance, 2020 - Wiley Online Library
We propose a model selection method to systematically evaluate the contribution to asset
pricing of any new factor, above and beyond what a high‐dimensional set of existing factors …

A comprehensive 2022 look at the empirical performance of equity premium prediction

A Goyal, I Welch, A Zafirov - The Review of Financial Studies, 2024 - academic.oup.com
Our paper reexamines whether 29 variables from 26 papers published after, as well as the
original 17 variables, were useful in predicting the equity premium in-sample and out-of …

Do socially (ir) responsible investments pay? New evidence from international ESG data

BR Auer, F Schuhmacher - The Quarterly Review of Economics and …, 2016 - Elsevier
Using a new dataset of environmental, social and corporate governance (ESG) company
ratings and state-of-the-art statistical methodology, this article analyses the performance of …

… and the cross-section of expected returns

CR Harvey, Y Liu, H Zhu - The Review of Financial Studies, 2016 - academic.oup.com
Hundreds of papers and factors attempt to explain the cross-section of expected returns.
Given this extensive data mining, it does not make sense to use the usual criteria for …

Does academic research destroy stock return predictability?

RD McLean, J Pontiff - The Journal of Finance, 2016 - Wiley Online Library
We study the out‐of‐sample and post‐publication return predictability of 97 variables shown
to predict cross‐sectional stock returns. Portfolio returns are 26% lower out‐of‐sample and …