[BOOK][B] Thinking twice: Two minds in one brain.

JSBT Evans - 2010 - psycnet.apa.org
Common sense suggests that we are in complete control of the actions we perform—that all
our actions are the result of considered and conscious preparation. Yet, there are countless …

[HTML][HTML] Why humans fail in solving the Monty Hall dilemma: A systematic review

L Saenen, M Heyvaert, W Van Dooren… - Psychologica …, 2018 - ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Why Humans Fail in Solving the Monty Hall Dilemma: A Systematic Review - PMC Back to
Top Skip to main content NIH NLM Logo Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage …

[BOOK][B] The Monty Hall problem: the remarkable story of Math's most contentious brain teaser

J Rosenhouse - 2009 - books.google.com
Mathematicians call it the Monty Hall Problem, and it is one of the most interesting
mathematical brain teasers of recent times. Imagine that you face three doors, behind one of …

Are birds smarter than mathematicians? Pigeons (Columba livia) perform optimally on a version of the Monty Hall Dilemma.

WT Herbranson, J Schroeder - Journal of Comparative Psychology, 2010 - psycnet.apa.org
Abstract The “Monty Hall Dilemma”(MHD) is a well known probability puzzle in which a
player tries to guess which of three doors conceals a desirable prize. After an initial choice is …

Partition-edit-count: naive extensional reasoning in judgment of conditional probability.

CR Fox, J Levav - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2004 - psycnet.apa.org
The authors provide evidence that people typically evaluate conditional probabilities by
subjectively partitioning the sample space into n interchangeable events, editing out events …

Reasoning and choice in the Monty Hall Dilemma (MHD): implications for improving Bayesian reasoning

E Tubau, D Aguilar-Lleyda, ED Johnson - Frontiers in psychology, 2015 - frontiersin.org
The Monty Hall Dilemma (MHD) is a two-step decision problem involving counterintuitive
conditional probabilities. The first choice is made among three equally probable options …

Sequentially simulated outcomes: Kind experience versus nontransparent description.

RM Hogarth, E Soyer - Journal of Experimental Psychology …, 2011 - psycnet.apa.org
Recently, researchers have investigated differences in decision making based on
description and experience. We address the issue of when experience-based judgments of …

The collider principle in causal reasoning: why the Monty Hall dilemma is so hard.

BD Burns, M Wieth - Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 2004 - psycnet.apa.org
The authors tested the thesis that people find the Monty Hall dilemma (MHD) hard because
they fail to understand the implications of its causal structure, a collider structure in which 2 …

Mechanisms for enhancing the credibility of an adviser: Prepayment and aligned incentives

AG Patt, HR Bowles, DW Cash - Journal of Behavioral Decision …, 2006 - Wiley Online Library
We tested the effectiveness of prepayment for advice and aligned incentives as mechanisms
for enhancing trust in unfamiliar advisers in decision‐making under uncertainty. Participants …

Learning inhibition in the Monty Hall Problem: The role of dysfunctional counterfactual prescriptions

JV Petrocelli, AK Harris - Personality and Social Psychology …, 2011 - journals.sagepub.com
Despite repeated trials, people consistently fail to learn the solution to the Monty Hall
problem (MHP). This research examines the links between learning, counterfactual thinking …