Challenges, experiments, and computational solutions in peer review Page 1 76
COMMUNICATIONS OF THE ACM | JUNE 2022 | VOL. 65 | NO. 6 review articles IMA GER YB Y …

Recent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) show the potential to significantly
augment or even replace complex human writing activities. However, for complex tasks …

The rapid development of science and technology has been accompanied by an
exponential growth in peer-reviewed scientific publications. At the same time, the review of …

Peer review and rebuttal, with rich interactions and argumentative discussions in between,
are naturally a good resource to mine arguments. However, few works study both of them …

The number of scientific articles produced every year is growing rapidly. Providing quality
control over them is crucial for scientists and, ultimately, for the public good. In modern …

Scientific papers are complex and understanding the usefulness of these papers requires
prior knowledge. Peer reviews are comments on a paper provided by designated experts on …

We consider the problem of automated assignment of papers to reviewers in conference
peer review, with a focus on fairness and statistical accuracy. Our fairness objective is to …

Peer review is a cornerstone of science. Research communities conduct peer reviews to
assess contributions and to improve the overall quality of science work. Every year, new …

Abstract Analysis of emotions elicited by opinions, comments, or articles commonly exploits
annotated corpora, in which the labels assigned to documents average the views of all …

Open peer review is a growing trend in academic publications. Public access to peer review
data can benefit both the academic and publishing communities. It also serves as a great …